GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023Boost: 1950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (5,500 vs 5,474), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Intel

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
G3D Mark Score
5,474
5,500
Architecture
Kepler
Xe LPG
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1344+33500%
4
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1950 MHz+99%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and System on the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_2
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
QuickSync
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
TDP
170W
15W-91%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.2
366.7+1039%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMGraphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK104
Meteor Lake iGPU
Release
September 27 2013
December 14 2023
Ranking
#417
#494

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.