GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VS
Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Tesla K80

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K80

2014Core: 562 MHzBoost: 824 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
98%
#328
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
13807%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
100%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
99%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
97%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
96%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
96%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
92%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
89%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
88%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
85%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
85%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.

InsightGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Tesla K80

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 824 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
G3D Mark Score
5,474+2%
5,363
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
2496 ×2+86%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
4.113 TFLOPS ×2+56%
Boost Clock
980 MHz+19%
824 MHz
ROPs
32
48 ×2+50%
TMUs
112
208 ×2+86%
L1 Cache
112 KB
208 KB+86%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
TDP
170W-43%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.2+80%
17.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla K80 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMTesla K80
MSRP
$5000
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GK104
GK210
Release
September 27 2013
November 17 2014
Ranking
#417
#419