
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:

Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,474+2% | 5,363 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2496 ×2+86% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2+56% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz+19% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 208 ×2+86% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 208 KB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2+80% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla K80 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK210 |
| Release | September 27 2013 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #417 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















