Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

  • 93.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 93.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,500 vs 5,449), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score
5,449
5,500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
4 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512
1792+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS+37%
3.892 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2599 MHz+139%
1086 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
112+250%
L1 Cache
128 KB
448 KB+250%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 760M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 97.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 760M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
VCN 4.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 82°C.

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-2%
82°C
Perf/Watt
363.3+396%
73.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon 760MRadeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP
$499
Codename
Phoenix
Ellesmere
Release
January 31 2024
November 18 2016
Ranking
#421
#416

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.