Radeon 760M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank 294 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 is on rank 132, so the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

99%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

96%

#284

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

697%

#286

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

632%

#287

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

630%

#291

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

573%

#292

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

569%

#294

Radeon 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#296

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

99%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

97%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

97%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

96%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

96%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

95%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

99%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

94%

#117

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1341%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

100%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

97%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

97%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

91%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

91%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

90%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

90%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

89%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

87%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

87%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

86%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 97.6% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.

Insight	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+97.6%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 5100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon Pro WX 5100

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score	5,449	5,500
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	1792+250%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS+37%	3.892 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2599 MHz+139%	1086 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	112+250%
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 760M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	VCN 4.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 82°C.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	—	173mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C-2%	82°C
Perf/Watt	363.3+396%	73.3