Radeon 760M vs Tesla K80

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 760M vs Tesla K80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 760M vs Tesla K80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 300W, a 285W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).

Tesla K80

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1900% higher power demand at 300W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 760M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (5,449 vs 5,363), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K80 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K80 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 760M vs Tesla K80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 824 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Tesla K80
G3D Mark Score	5,449+2%	5,363
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Kepler 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	2496 ×2+388%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.323 TFLOPS+29%	4.113 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2599 MHz+215%	824 MHz
ROPs	16	48 ×2+200%
TMUs	32	208 ×2+550%
L1 Cache	128 KB	208 KB+63%
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 760M	Tesla K80
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 760M and 128-bit on the Tesla K80. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Tesla K80
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 760M	Tesla K80
TDP	15W-95%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	363.3+1930%	17.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon 760M	Tesla K80
MSRP	—	$5000
Codename	Phoenix	GK210
Release	January 31 2024	November 17 2014
Ranking	#421	#419

Search Radeon 760M on Amazon

Search Tesla K80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.