Radeon 760M vs Tesla K80
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank 294 and the Tesla K80 is on rank 343, so the Radeon 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K80 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K80.
| Insight | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Tesla K80
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449+2% | 5,363 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2496 ×2+388% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.323 TFLOPS+29% | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+215% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 ×2+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 208 ×2+550% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 208 KB+63% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 760M) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 181% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+1930% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Phoenix | GK210 |
| Release | January 31 2024 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #421 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 760M and Tesla K80
