Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon 760M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

15

5,500

+0.9%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

5,449

0.0%

Radeon R9 260

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank 264 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

#254

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

592%

#256

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

537%

#257

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

536%

#261

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

487%

#262

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

484%

#264

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#265

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

100%

#270

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

95%

#271

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

94%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

93%

#275

GeForce GTS 160M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

93%

#276

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

92%

#277

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G

MSRP: $99|Avg: $70

92%

#279

Radeon RX Vega 9

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

99%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

96%

#284

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

697%

#286

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

632%

#287

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

630%

#291

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

573%

#292

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

569%

#294

Radeon 760M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

99%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

97%

#302

Arc Graphics 130V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

97%

#303

Radeon R5 430

MSRP: $59|Avg: $50

96%

#304

GeForce MX150

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

96%

#307

GeForce MX450

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#308

Arc Graphics 140V

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

95%

#309

Radeon R7 A8-8650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.

Insight	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Radeon 760M

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,449
Architecture	Xe LPG	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4	512+12700%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz	2599 MHz+33%
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon 760M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.