GeForce GTX 680
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce GTX 680 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 680 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌1200% higher power demand at 195W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 63.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 195W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609+2% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+38300% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 1950 MHz+84% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 171.4% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 256mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 256mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | 85-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8 | 366.7+1173% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 680 came in at $499, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300. On MSRP, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) was 39.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers 63.4% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 18.3+63% |
| Codename | GK104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | March 22 2012 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #410 | #496 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 680 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
