Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

CPU

GPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1950 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

4 GB 15

5,500

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

5,550

+0.9%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

2023

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 190W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
50.8% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1166.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,550 vs 5,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.1% (27.9 vs 18.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has the stronger long-term case.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,550
Architecture	Xe LPG	GCN 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4	1792+44700%
L1 Cache	768 KB+71%	448 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	176 GB/s
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 3.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 5.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 170.7% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP	15W-92%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	0mm	221mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	366.7+1156%	29.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 33.7% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.3 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 52.5% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP	$300	$199-34%
Performance per Dollar	18.3	27.9+52%
Codename	Meteor Lake iGPU	Tonga
Release	December 14 2023	September 2 2014
Ranking	#496	#365

Search Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 285 / 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.