Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Radeon TM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank 264 and the Radeon TM is on rank 55, so the Radeon TM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon TM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon TM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Radeon TM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,564+1% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 1024+25500% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2900 MHz+49% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7 | 370.9+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Strix Point |
| Release | December 14 2023 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #496 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Radeon TM
