Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs Quadro M3000M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

15

5,500

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

5,574

+1.3%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank 264 and the Quadro M3000M is on rank 9, so the Quadro M3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

#254

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

592%

#256

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

537%

#257

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

536%

#261

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

487%

#262

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

484%

#264

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#265

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

100%

#270

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

95%

#271

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

94%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

93%

#275

GeForce GTS 160M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

93%

#276

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

92%

#277

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G

MSRP: $99|Avg: $70

92%

#279

Radeon RX Vega 9

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M3000M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

186%

#9

Quadro M3000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M3000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M3000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).

Insight	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M3000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Benchmark Check

Quadro M3000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Quadro M3000M

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the Quadro M3000M reaches 5,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,574+1%
Architecture	Xe LPG	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4	1,024+25500%
L1 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)	Quadro M3000M
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	366.7+394%	74.3