GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌500% higher power demand at 90W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 90W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 950 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 950 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 760M instead at 5,449 vs 5,357, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, and 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,357	5,449+2%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+192%
Boost Clock	1188 MHz	2599 MHz+119%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+50%	32
L1 Cache	288 KB+125%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 760M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M carries 4 GB. Radeon 760M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and System on the Radeon 760M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	106 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_2)
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
TDP	90W	15W-83%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	202mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	59.5	363.3+511%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon 760M
MSRP	$159	—
Codename	GM206	Phoenix
Release	August 20 2015	January 31 2024
Ranking	#425	#421

Search GeForce GTX 950 on Amazon

Search Radeon 760M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.