
GeForce GTX 950 vs Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

Tesla K80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K80
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K80 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950 holds the technical lead. Priced at $48 (vs $50), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 4.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Tesla K80

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Tesla K80
The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Tesla K80 reaches 5,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 824 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,363 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2496 ×2+225% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2+125% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+44% | 824 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 208 ×2+333% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+38% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K80 has 4 GB. The Tesla K80 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-70% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5+232% | 17.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 4% less ($2 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 107.3 (Tesla K80) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 4% better value. The GeForce GTX 950 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Tesla K80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-97% | $5000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-4% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6+4% | 107.3 |
| Codename | GM206 | GK210 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | November 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #425 | #419 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















