GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20% higher power demand at 90W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

  • 3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 90W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 950 instead at 5,357 vs 5,310, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1417 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
5,357
5,310
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.825 TFLOPS
2.177 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1417 MHz+19%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
48
L1 Cache
288 KB
288 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 5.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
106 GB/s
112 GB/s+6%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder
NVENC 2nd Gen
NVENC (6th Gen)
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd Gen
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP
90W
75W-17%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
202mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
59.5
70.8+19%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$159
Codename
GM206
GP107
Release
August 20 2015
January 3 2018
Ranking
#425
#429

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.