
GeForce GTX 950

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 90W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
2018Why buy it
- ✅3.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 950 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 90W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1417 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,310 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 2.177 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1417 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 5.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 112 GB/s+6% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 75W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 70.8+19% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | GP107 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | January 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #425 | #429 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















