
GeForce GTX 950 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (16nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $150 for the Quadro P2000 (móvel), it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 212.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+212.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Quadro P2000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1291 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1152+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 2.974 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1291 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 72+50% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 432 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 75W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 71.4+20% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 68% less ($102 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 35.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 212.6% better value. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-68% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-68% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6+213% | 35.7 |
| Codename | GM206 | GP106 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | February 15 2019 |
| Ranking | #425 | #399 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















