
GeForce GTX 950 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1468 MHz+24% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 11.8% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 80W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 66.9+12% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | — |
| Codename | GM206 | GP107GL |
| Release | August 20 2015 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #425 | #426 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















