GeForce GTX 950 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+19100% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 1950 MHz+64% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 768 KB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 142.9% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 15W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 366.7+516% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($48 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM206 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | August 20 2015 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #425 | #495 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 950 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
