GeForce GTX 950
Radeon Pro WX 5100
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 90W vs 75W.
- ❌16.8% longer card at 202mm vs 173mm.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
2016Why buy it
- ✅70.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅295.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 90W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 202mm, a 29mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌213.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1086 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 3.892 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz+9% | 1086 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 448 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 950 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 295.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 7.906 GB+295% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 75W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 73.3+23% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 950 came in at $159, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 68.1% cheaper ($340 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 206.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-68% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7+206% | 11.0 |
| Codename | GM206 | Ellesmere |
| Release | August 20 2015 | November 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #425 | #416 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon Pro WX 5100
