G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

✅17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
150.9% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.4 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌88.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 90W.
❌19.3% longer card at 241mm vs 202mm.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 150.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 13.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 170W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 241mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (5,361 vs 5,357), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $240 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 150.8% (33.7 vs 13.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 950 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 670 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1188 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
G3D Mark Score	5,361	5,357
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+75%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS+44%	1.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1188 MHz+21%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	112 KB	288 KB+157%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) vs 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) — a 81.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 670. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 670 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+81%	106 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
Encoder	NVENC (3rd Gen)	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (1st Gen)	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 61.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
TDP	170W	90W-47%
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	241mm	202mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	82 C	—
Perf/Watt	31.5	59.5+89%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 670 came in at $399, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 60.2% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.4 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 151.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 950 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	GeForce GTX 950
MSRP	$399	$159-60%
Performance per Dollar	13.4	33.7+151%
Codename	GK104	GM206
Release	May 10 2012	August 20 2015
Ranking	#424	#425

Search GeForce GTX 670 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.