Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 670 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023Boost: 1950 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 670 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 670
4 GB 170
5,361
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 680M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
4 GB 15
5,500
+2.6%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc A730M
brand logoArc B570

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (5,500 vs 5,361), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670 vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
G3D Mark Score
5,361
5,500+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Xe LPG
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1344+33500%
4
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1950 MHz+99%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 670 and System on the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_2
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Encoder
NVENC (3rd Gen)
QuickSync
Decoder
NVDEC (1st Gen)
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
TDP
170W
15W-91%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
82 C
—
Perf/Watt
31.5
366.7+1064%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 670 came in at $399, while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0. On MSRP, Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) was 100+% cheaper ($399 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.4 (GeForce GTX 670) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) (2023 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
MSRP
$399
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
13.4
Infinity
Codename
GK104
Meteor Lake iGPU
Release
May 10 2012
December 14 2023
Ranking
#424
#494
Search GeForce GTX 670 on AmazonSearch Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.