GeForce GTX 670 vs L2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670 vs L2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670 vs L2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 391.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 275W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.

L2

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
401.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 13.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌61.8% higher power demand at 275W vs 170W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

L2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (5,467 vs 5,361), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

L2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 92 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 391.5% (13.4 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, L2 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670 vs L2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

L2

The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
G3D Mark Score	5,361	5,467+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1344	11776+776%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS+2153%
Boost Clock	980 MHz	2520 MHz+157%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	112	368+229%
L1 Cache	0.11 MB	11.5 MB+10355%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	96 MB+19100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The L2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 670 and 128-bit on the L2. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	96 MB+19100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_2
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
Encoder	NVENC (3rd Gen)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (1st Gen)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the L2's 275W — a 47.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
TDP	170W-38%	275W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	82 C	—
Perf/Watt	31.5+58%	19.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 670 came in at $399, while the L2 launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 670 was 80% cheaper ($1601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.4 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce GTX 670 offers 396.3% better value. The newer card here is L2 (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670	L2
MSRP	$399-80%	$2000
Performance per Dollar	13.4+396%	2.7
Codename	GK104	AD102
Release	May 10 2012	November 16 2023
Ranking	#424	#189

Search GeForce GTX 670 on Amazon

Search L2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.