GeForce GTX 670 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
GeForce GTX 670
Popular choices:
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1200 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The Quadro T1200 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 670 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 670.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T1200 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro T1200 Mobile
GeForce GTX 670
The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the Quadro T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,361 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+31% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 2.918 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1425 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.11 MB | 1 MB+809% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) — the Quadro T1200 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the Quadro T1200 Mobile's 18W — a 161.7% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 18W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5 | 305.6+870% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | Quadro T1200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | TU117 |
| Release | May 10 2012 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #424 | #347 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro T1200 Mobile
