GeForce GTX 670 vs GeForce GTX 970M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970M SLI

2014Core: 924 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI

2014

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 970M SLI better than GeForce GTX 670?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,361 vs 5,500 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 970M SLI is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 670 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 970M SLI is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 970M SLI is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 2.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 670 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 670 make more sense than GeForce GTX 970M SLI?
Yes. GeForce GTX 670 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 970M SLI. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 970M SLI currently gives you 2.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 670 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
1080p
low100 FPS49 FPS
medium86 FPS41 FPS
high68 FPS28 FPS
ultra40 FPS17 FPS
1440p
low87 FPS40 FPS
medium77 FPS30 FPS
high53 FPS18 FPS
ultra31 FPS10 FPS
4K
low28 FPS13 FPS
medium26 FPS10 FPS
high17 FPS6 FPS
ultra15 FPS6 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
1080p
low123 FPS92 FPS
medium88 FPS63 FPS
high65 FPS45 FPS
ultra41 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS51 FPS
medium45 FPS30 FPS
high32 FPS21 FPS
ultra22 FPS15 FPS
4K
low26 FPS17 FPS
medium17 FPS11 FPS
high13 FPS8 FPS
ultra9 FPS6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
1080p
low241 FPS248 FPS
medium193 FPS198 FPS
high161 FPS165 FPS
ultra121 FPS124 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS186 FPS
medium145 FPS148 FPS
high121 FPS124 FPS
ultra90 FPS93 FPS
4K
low121 FPS124 FPS
medium96 FPS99 FPS
high80 FPS82 FPS
ultra60 FPS62 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
1080p
low181 FPS132 FPS
medium136 FPS106 FPS
high122 FPS76 FPS
ultra94 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low138 FPS78 FPS
medium106 FPS58 FPS
high95 FPS45 FPS
ultra68 FPS30 FPS
4K
low81 FPS41 FPS
medium59 FPS30 FPS
high48 FPS22 FPS
ultra32 FPS15 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 970M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970M SLI

The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the GeForce GTX 970M SLI reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 970M SLI uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
G3D Mark Score
5,361
5,500+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
2560+90%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1038 MHz+6%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) vs 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) — a 526% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit x2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+60%
120 GB/s x2
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit x2
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Encoder
NVENC (3rd Gen)
NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (1st Gen)
PureVideo HD (VP6)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 970M SLI's 162W — a 4.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
TDP
170W
162W-5%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
82 C
80°C-2%
Perf/Watt
31.5
34.0+8%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GeForce GTX 970M SLI
MSRP
$399
Codename
GK104
Release
May 10 2012
October 7 2014
Ranking
#424
#284