
GeForce GTX 670
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 670
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 670
2012GeForce GTX 970M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 970M SLI better than GeForce GTX 670?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 670 make more sense than GeForce GTX 970M SLI?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GTX 970M SLI

GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 670
The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 162W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the GeForce GTX 970M SLI reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 970M SLI uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,361 | 5,500+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2560+90% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1038 MHz+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 670) vs 120 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 970M SLI) — a 526% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970M SLI. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+60% | 120 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit x2 |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (3rd Gen) (GeForce GTX 670) vs NVENC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs PureVideo HD (VP6). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 670) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (3rd Gen) | NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | PureVideo HD (VP6) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the GeForce GTX 970M SLI's 162W — a 4.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M SLI). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 162W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82 C | 80°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.5 | 34.0+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 970M SLI is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670 | GeForce GTX 970M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | — |
| Release | May 10 2012 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #424 | #284 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













