GeForce GTX 950
Radeon RX 6300
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 950
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌165% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅19.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 163.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon RX 6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the Radeon RX 6300 reaches 5,319 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,357 | 5,319 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.825 TFLOPS | 3.686 TFLOPS+102% |
| Boost Clock | 1188 MHz | 2400 MHz+102% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+13% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 950 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 950 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6300 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 65.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 950. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s+66% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 88% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 202mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 35W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 202mm | 160mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Perf/Watt | 59.5 | 152.0+155% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 950 came in at $159, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 62.3% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 163.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950 | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $60-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.7 | 88.7+163% |
| Codename | GM206 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 20 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #425 | #379 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon RX 6300
