GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 760M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

2010

Why buy it

  • 41.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1360% higher power demand at 219W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 219W, a 204W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,500 vs 5,449), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 760M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,500
5,449
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
480
512+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+279%
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
60+88%
32
L1 Cache
960 KB+650%
128 KB
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
2 MB+217%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 760M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and System on the Radeon 760M. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
156 GB/s
System
Bus Width
320-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
2 MB+217%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 174.4% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
TDP
219W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
25.1
363.3+1347%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2Radeon 760M
MSRP
$349
Codename
GF110
Phoenix
Release
December 7 2010
January 31 2024
Ranking
#610
#421

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.