
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 680

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (256mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 680 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 14.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and GeForce GTX 680

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 680 reaches 5,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 680 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,609+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1536+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 3.25 TFLOPS+131% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 128+113% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+650% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) — a 23.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 680. Bus width: 320-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 680) — the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s+23% |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+25% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the GeForce GTX 680's 195W — a 11.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 680). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 256mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 98°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 195W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 256mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-13% | 98°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 28.8+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 680 costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 122.2 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 14.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 680 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-30% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | $40-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2 | 140.2+15% |
| Codename | GF110 | GK104 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #610 | #410 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















