GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon TM
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon TM is significantly newer (2024 vs 2010). The Radeon TM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon TM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon TM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and Radeon TM
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the Radeon TM reaches 5,564 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,564+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1024+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 5.939 TFLOPS+323% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 64+7% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 320-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon TM) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+150% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 174.4% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 370.9+1378% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45 | — |
| Codename | GF110 | Strix Point |
| Release | December 7 2010 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #610 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and Radeon TM
