
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2

Radeon R9 285 / 380
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 285 / 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌75.4% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌15.3% higher power demand at 219W vs 190W.
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅14.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 219W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Measures 221mm instead of 267mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1792+273% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 3.29 TFLOPS+134% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 112+87% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+114% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 12.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 285 / 380. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 156 GB/s | 176 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+25% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+25% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 draws 219W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 14.2% difference. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 190W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 29.2+16% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 came in at $349, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 43% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 76.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 285 / 380 (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $199-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 27.9+77% |
| Codename | GF110 | Tonga |
| Release | December 7 2010 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #610 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















