Radeon 760M vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 760M is positioned at rank 294 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is on rank 264, so the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 760M and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 760M scores 5,449 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 760M) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 2599 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,449 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2560+400% |
| Boost Clock | 2599 MHz+189% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 153.6 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 760M draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 760M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 363.3+1221% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon 760M | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $75 |
| Codename | Phoenix | Neptune CF |
| Release | January 31 2024 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #421 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 760M and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
