Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Radeon 760M
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 512+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2599 MHz+33% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and System on the Radeon 760M.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7 | 363.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 760M (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Phoenix |
| Release | December 14 2023 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #495 | #421 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon 760M
