
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon 760M

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon 760M

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 512+12700% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2599 MHz+33% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: QuickSync vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7 | 363.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Phoenix |
| Release | December 14 2023 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #495 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















