Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 285 / 380 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon R9 285 / 380
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 1792+44700% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+71% | 448 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 has 2 GB. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 170.7% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1156% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 27.9 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | Tonga |
| Release | December 14 2023 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #495 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon R9 285 / 380
