Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014Core: 918 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Performance Spectrum

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
4 GB 15
5,500
0.0%
brand logoArc 8-Core iGPU
brand logoArc Graphics 130V
brand logoArc A730M
brand logoArc B570
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2 GB 190
5,550
+0.9%
brand logoRadeon HD 7790
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon R9 270
brand logoRadeon R9 M395
brand logoRadeon RX 6550M
brand logoRadeon RX 6600M
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 190W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌1166.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,550 vs 5,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 285 / 380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has the stronger long-term case.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score
5,500
5,550
Architecture
Xe LPG
GCN 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4
1792+44700%
L1 Cache
768 KB+71%
448 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
176 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
DirectX
12_2
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: QuickSync vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
Encoder
QuickSync
VCE 3.0
Decoder
QuickSync
UVD 5.0
Codecs
MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 170.7% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP
15W-92%
190W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
221mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
366.7+1156%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGraphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
27.9
Codename
Meteor Lake iGPU
Tonga
Release
December 14 2023
September 2 2014
Ranking
#495
#365
Search Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 285 / 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.