Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
L2
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs L2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs L2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs L2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 275W, a 260W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌1733.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs L2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the L2 reaches 5,467 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 11,776 (L2). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 11776+294300% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2520 MHz+29% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 11.5 MB+1433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and 128-bit on the L2.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the L2's 275W — a 179.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1743% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) came in at $0, while the L2 launched at $2000. On MSRP, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) was 100+% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 2.7 (L2) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.7 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | AD102 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #495 | #189 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and L2
