Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
GRID M60-8A
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs GRID M60-8A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs GRID M60-8A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs GRID M60-8A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
GRID M60-8A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs GRID M60-8A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,523 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 2048+51100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+66% | 1178 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-8A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 175% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1397% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) came in at $0, while the GRID M60-8A launched at $2500. On MSRP, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 2.2 (GRID M60-8A) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.2 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GM204 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #495 | #505 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and GRID M60-8A
