
Quadro M3000M

Radeon Pro WX 5100
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 5100
2016Why buy it
- ✅35.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M3000M vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,574+1% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.15 TFLOPS | 3.892 TFLOPS+81% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 448 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M3000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 97.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro M3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 7.906 GB+98% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.3+1% | 73.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Codename | GM204 | Ellesmere |
| Release | August 18 2015 | November 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #411 | #416 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















