Radeon Pro WX 5100
VS
Radeon 760M

Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon 760M

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is positioned at rank 132 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
99%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
94%
#117
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1341%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
100%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
97%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
97%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
91%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
91%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
90%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
90%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
89%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
87%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
87%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
86%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
99%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
96%
#284
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
697%
#286
632%
#287
630%
#291
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
573%
#292
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
569%
#294
Radeon 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
99%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
96%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
96%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 97.6% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+97.6%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon 760M

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1086 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,500
5,449
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1792+250%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.892 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock
1086 MHz
2599 MHz+139%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
112+250%
32
L1 Cache
448 KB+250%
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
7.906 GB+98%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCN 4.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
173mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
82°C
80°C-2%
Perf/Watt
73.3
363.3+396%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 5100Radeon 760M
MSRP
$499
Avg Price (30d)
$120
Codename
Ellesmere
Phoenix
Release
November 18 2016
January 31 2024
Ranking
#416
#421