
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is positioned at rank 132 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 760M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon 760M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 97.6% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+97.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Radeon 760M

Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1086 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+250% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.892 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | 2599 MHz+139% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+250% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 7.906 GB+98% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 80°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 73.3 | 363.3+396% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | — |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Phoenix |
| Release | November 18 2016 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #416 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















