Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce RTX 2050
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is positioned at rank #144 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2050 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $180 for the Radeon Pro WX 7100, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7100 and GeForce RTX 2050
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the GeForce RTX 2050 reaches 7,714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 2050 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1710 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,701 | 7,714 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2944+28% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.728 TFLOPS | 10.07 TFLOPS+76% |
| Boost Clock | 1243 MHz | 1710 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 184+28% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 2.9 MB+418% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2050 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 2050's 215W — a 49.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 2050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-40% | 215W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.2+65% | 35.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $180, while the GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 2050 costs 16.7% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.8 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 20.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2050 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 7100 | GeForce RTX 2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $150-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $180 | $150-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.8 | 51.4+20% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | TU104 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #331 | #94 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 7100 and GeForce RTX 2050
