Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is positioned at rank 144 and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is on rank 316, so the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

93%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

90%

#129

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1532%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

100%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

99%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

98%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

98%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

96%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

95%

#151

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

94%

#152

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

94%

#154

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

93%

#155

Radeon Pro WX 4150

MSRP: $300|Avg: $120

91%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

89%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

100%

#306

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

774%

#308

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

701%

#309

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

700%

#313

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

636%

#314

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

632%

#316

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

99%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

97%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

96%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

96%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

92%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 7100 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 7100 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Radeon Pro WX 7100

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 7,701 and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile reaches 7,717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Raw compute: 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1243 MHz vs 1477 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	7,701	7,717
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Ampere
Process Node	14 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.728 TFLOPS	6.05 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock	1243 MHz	1477 MHz+19%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144+125%	64
L1 Cache	0.56 MB	2.5 MB+346%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Encoder	VCE 3.4	NVENC 8.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo HD VP11
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile's 45W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100) vs 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 7100	GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
TDP	130W	45W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	59.2	171.5+190%