Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs GeForce GTX 1060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

134%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

131%

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

121%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

119%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

117%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

114%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

114%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

111%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

107%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

105%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

101%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

100%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

98%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

98%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

95%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

94%

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

86%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

82%

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

71%

#72

Quadro P4200

MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110

68%

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

60%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

56%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+25.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-25.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $350 for the Radeon Pro WX 8200, it costs 83% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 365.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+365.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350)	✅More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 8200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 leads by 25.3%. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score	12,615+25%	10,064
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3584+40%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS+21%	8.873 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	1733 MHz+16%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	224+40%	160
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX	12.1	12
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder	VCE 4.0	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	UVD 7.0	NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 8200	GeForce GTX 1060
TDP	230W	180W-22%
Recommended PSU	500W	400W-20%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin
Length	267mm	173mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	54.8	55.9+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 82.9% less ($290 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 365.8% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).