Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Arc A750
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $350 for the Radeon Pro WX 8200, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 52.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+52.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Arc A750
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2400 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 224 | 224 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 225W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 78°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 56.0+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The Arc A750 costs 34.6% less ($121 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 offers 52.8% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $289-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $229-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0 | 55.0+53% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | DG2-512 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #210 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Arc A750
