Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Tesla T10
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Radeon Pro WX 8200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla T10.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $350 versus $975 for the Tesla T10, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 179.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+179.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($350) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($975) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Tesla T10
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 12,615 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,615 | 12,558 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4608+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 | 288+29% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 draws 230W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 12.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-12% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8+13% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000 and now averages $975. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 costs 64.1% less ($625 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) vs 12.9 (Tesla T10) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 179.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 8200 | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-50% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350-64% | $975 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0+179% | 12.9 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | TU102 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #210 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Tesla T10
