GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

6 GB 120

12,747

+1.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

Radeon Pro WX 8200

8 GB 230

12,615

0.0%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 261.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 120W instead of 230W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 8200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
258.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
❌91.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 120W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1660 Ti instead at 12,747 vs 12,615, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 261.8% (45.7 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 8200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score	12,747+1%	12,615
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	3584+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+98%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+18%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	224+133%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+70%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 8200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 62.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP	120W-48%	230W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2+94%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti came in at $279, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 262.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP	$279-72%	$999
Performance per Dollar	45.7+263%	12.6
Codename	TU116	Vega 10
Release	February 22 2019	August 13 2018
Ranking	#204	#210

Search GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 8200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.