Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 230W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌187.5% higher power demand at 230W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,675 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,675 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 1500 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+241% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 96.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-65% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 158.4+189% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #208 | #210 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro WX 8200
