G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (12,675 vs 12,617), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025), while GRID RTX6000-1Q is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and 48 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID RTX6000-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, GRID RTX6000-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	12,617	12,675
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2048	3072+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS+72%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1350 MHz+15%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	192+50%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	3 MB+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID RTX6000-1Q does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GRID RTX6000-1Q is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID RTX6000-1Q has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID RTX6000-1Q and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	225W	80W-64%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	56.1	158.4+182%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID RTX6000-1Q	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$6299	—
Codename	GM204	TU104
Release	August 30 2015	May 27 2019
Ranking	#525	#208

Search GRID RTX6000-1Q on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.