GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 64
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID RTX6000-1Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro Vega 64 holds the technical lead. Priced at $114 (vs $1,500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1244.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1244.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($114) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro Vega 64
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 64
The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,891 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64 reaches 12,891 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,891+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 11.06 TFLOPS+129% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1350 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 256+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has 0 MB. The GRID RTX6000-1Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+9% | 51.6 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64 launched at $599 and now averages $114. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 costs 92.4% less ($1386 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 113.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64 offers 1246.4% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $599-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $114-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 113.1+1246% |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #525 | #202 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro Vega 64
