GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Tesla T10

NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla T10

Boost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
··

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Tesla T10 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Tesla T10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 225W instead of 260W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 215% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,299 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Tesla T10

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,299 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 213.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
  • GRID RTX6000-1Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Tesla T10 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 15.6% higher power demand at 260W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID RTX6000-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (12,617 vs 12,558), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tesla T10 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla T10 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,299 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $6,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 213.5% (6.3 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID RTX6000-1Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Tesla T10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-1Q

The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla T10

The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
G3D Mark Score
12,617
12,558
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048
4608+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
14.38 TFLOPS+198%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1560 MHz+32%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
128
288+125%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-1Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla T10 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID RTX6000-1Q and 256-bit on the Tesla T10.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 14.4% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
TDP
225W-13%
260W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
56.1+16%
48.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID RTX6000-1Q came in at $6299, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000. On MSRP, Tesla T10 was 68.2% cheaper ($4299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 6.3 (Tesla T10) — the Tesla T10 offers 215% better value.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QTesla T10
MSRP
$6299
$2000-68%
Performance per Dollar
2.0
6.3+215%
Codename
GM204
TU102
Release
August 30 2015
sem dados
Ranking
#525
#213

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.