
GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Tesla T10

GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The GRID RTX6000-1Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla T10.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla T10 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $975 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 53.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($975) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Tesla T10

GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,558 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+198% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1560 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 288+125% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 14.4% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-13% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+16% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000 and now averages $975. The Tesla T10 costs 35% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.9 (Tesla T10) — the Tesla T10 offers 53.6% better value.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $2000-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $975-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 12.9+54% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU102 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #525 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














