GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 8200.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $350 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 77% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 328.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+328.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($350) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro WX 8200
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1500 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 224+75% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-2% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1+2% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999 and now averages $350. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 costs 76.7% less ($1150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 36.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 328.6% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $999-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $350-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 36.0+329% |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #525 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro WX 8200
