Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum

GRID RTX6000-1Q
8 GB 225
12,617
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoRTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Radeon Pro WX 8200
8 GB 230
12,615
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 470 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon R9 290X
brand logoRadeon 8040S
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7800M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 7700 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    530.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,299 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 530.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
  • ✅GRID RTX6000-1Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID RTX6000-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (12,617 vs 12,615), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,300 cheaper on MSRP at $999 vs $6,299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 530.4% (12.6 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID RTX6000-1Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID RTX6000-1Q

The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score
12,617
12,615
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
3584+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS+123%
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1500 MHz+27%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
224+75%
L1 Cache
768 KB
896 KB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-1Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID RTX6000-1Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
TDP
225W-2%
230W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
56.1+2%
54.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID RTX6000-1Q came in at $6299, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 8200 was 84.1% cheaper ($5300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 530% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 8200 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID RTX6000-1QRadeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP
$6299
$999-84%
Performance per Dollar
2.0
12.6+530%
Codename
GM204
Vega 10
Release
August 30 2015
August 13 2018
Ranking
#525
#210
Search GRID RTX6000-1Q on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro WX 8200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.