
Quadro P5000

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro P5000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅5.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 12,675 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+7% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+28% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3 MB+219% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P5000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 16 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 80W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 158.4+124% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #206 | #208 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














