Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600X

2021Core: 2068 MHzBoost: 2479 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 257.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.

Radeon PRO W6600X

2021

Why buy it

  • 2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 268.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO W6600X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (13,113 vs 12,728), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6600X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 16nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6600X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,800 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 268.3% (18.8 vs 5.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600X

The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2479 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
G3D Mark Score
12,728
13,113+3%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.15 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
2479 MHz+43%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+25%
128
L1 Cache
960 KB+88%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X carries 8 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600X.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+29%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.0
1.3+30%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCN 3.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
TDP
180W
120W-33%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
70.7
109.3+55%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6600X was 72% cheaper ($1800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon PRO W6600X offers 268.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600X (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP
$2499
$699-72%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
18.8+269%
Codename
GP104
Navi 23
Release
October 1 2016
August 3 2021
Ranking
#206
#197

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.