
Quadro P5000

Radeon PRO W6600X
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌257.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W6600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,113+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2479 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X carries 8 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600X.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 109.3+55% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6600X was 72% cheaper ($1800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Radeon PRO W6600X offers 268.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600X (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $699-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 18.8+269% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #206 | #197 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














