
Quadro P5000

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅20.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P5000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 12.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition reaches 12,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1600 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 12,753 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4096+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 13.11 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+8% | 1600 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition carries 0 MB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and System on the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition's 300W — a 50% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7+66% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Vega Frontier Edition was 60% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.8 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) — the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition offers 151% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $999-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 12.8+151% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #206 | #203 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














