Quadro P5000
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 400W, a 220W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅27.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 400W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1967 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 13,182+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3840 ×2+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+70% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1967 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 864 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-55% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7+114% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, Quadro P5000 was 28.6% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Quadro P5000 offers 34.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-29% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1+34% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #206 | #157 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5000 and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
