Quadro P5000 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $400 for the Quadro P5000, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 262.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+262.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($110) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 12,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 12,692 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+77% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1785 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1.4 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the Quadro P5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 125W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7 | 101.5+44% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 and now averages $110. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 72.5% less ($290 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.8 (Quadro P5000) vs 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 262.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $229-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $110-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.8 | 115.4+263% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU116 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | October 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #206 | #207 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5000 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
