Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

  • 4.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 150.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 147.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Quadro P5000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (12,728 vs 12,615), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,500 cheaper on MSRP at $999 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.9% (12.6 vs 5.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P5000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score
12,728
12,615
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
3584+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+16%
1500 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
224+40%
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.0
1.1+10%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP
180W-22%
230W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
70.7+29%
54.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 8200 was 60% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 147.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 8200 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P5000Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP
$2499
$999-60%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
12.6+147%
Codename
GP104
Vega 10
Release
October 1 2016
August 13 2018
Ranking
#206
#210

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.