
Quadro P5000

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅4.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 8200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro P5000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 scores 12,728 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,728 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3584+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+16% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. Quadro P5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.7+29% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P5000 came in at $2499, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 8200 was 60% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.1 (Quadro P5000) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 offers 147.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 8200 (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $999-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1 | 12.6+147% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #206 | #210 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














